Even Faster!
Categories: [ Blog ]
I dug again into my hacked blosxom to find more ugliness, such as opening
files for all the stories, including the ones that are not going to be
displayed. This divided the time spent in blosxom::generate by 3.
Surprisingly, replacing the look-behind assertions in
interpolate_fancy::__ANON__'s regexps didn't made as big a difference as in
textrite::rite (1.11 ms against 0.813 ms), probably because there wasn't
that many of them and weren't called that often
Profiling results are now like this:
Total Elapsed Time = 1.236275 Seconds User+System Time = 1.066275 Seconds Exclusive Times %Time ExclSec CumulS #Calls sec/call Csec/c Name 10.2 0.109 0.127 134 0.0008 0.0010 interpolate_fancy::__ANON__ 7.50 0.080 0.178 13 0.0061 0.0137 blosxom::BEGIN 5.06 0.054 0.428 1 0.0540 0.4283 blosxom::generate 4.41 0.047 0.098 368 0.0001 0.0003 entries_index::__ANON__ 3.75 0.040 0.040 7 0.0057 0.0057 CGI::_compile 3.75 0.040 0.054 9 0.0044 0.0061 CGI::import 3.75 0.040 0.040 40 0.0010 0.0010 textrite::rite 3.66 0.039 0.039 690 0.0001 0.0001 File::Basename::fileparse 2.81 0.030 0.060 8 0.0037 0.0074 Net::SMTP::BEGIN 2.81 0.030 -0.000 62 0.0005 - Exporter::import 2.81 0.030 0.030 40 0.0007 0.0007 magiclink::story 1.88 0.020 0.020 5 0.0040 0.0040 autotrack::BEGIN 1.88 0.020 0.030 7 0.0029 0.0042 IO::File::BEGIN 1.88 0.020 0.089 8 0.0025 0.0111 writeback::BEGIN 1.88 0.020 0.020 41 0.0005 0.0005 writeback::real_path
The User+System Time is lower, but for some reason the Total Elapsed Time is about the same.
[ Posted on May 8th, 2007 at 22:42 | no comment | permanent link ]
